 idway through The Breakfast Club, John Hughes’s seminal film about Reagan-era
teen angst, the five main characters tuck into brown-bag lunches. Actress Molly
Ringwald, playing the archetypal suburban princess, pulls out a tray of sushi, to the astonishment
of Judd Nelson’s drug-addled outcast.
“You won’t accept a guy’s tongue in
your mouth, and you’re going to eat that?” he sneers, obviously never having sampled
a piece of toro (fatty tuna) or hamachi (yellowtail) himself.
Ringwald’s character is offended by the innuendo, but also derisive of her inquisitor’s
lack of sophistication.
“Can I eat?” she huffs in response.
“I don’t know,” says Nelson, eyes wide with revulsion. “Give it a try.”
Depicting Ringwald’s spoiled brat as an unapologetic sushi eater was an easy way for
Hughes to underscore her elitism. In 1985, the year The Breakfast Club came out, sushi
was still a mystery to most Americans, who associated the food with flighty Hollywood
stars and reprehensible yuppies. Raw fish and seaweed, rolled into cones or tubes? Such
dainty, briny fare was surely part of a Japanese plot to weaken the American spirit.
Twenty-two years later, Hughes’s cinematic shorthand seems archaic, akin to sticking
a handlebar mustache on a movie’s villain. No self-respecting American city, however
distant from the oceans, is without a sushi restaurant, perhaps one that offers a
$12.99 all-you-can-eat special on Monday nights, or prepackaged trays of Philadelphia
rolls tinged with cream cheese. Sushi is a favorite of fictional gangster Tony Soprano,
and of real-life football demigod Peyton Manning (who, according to the Boston Herald,
recently treated on-the-field rival Tom Brady to a dinner of toro tartare, hamachi with
elephant garlic, and hot sake).
Sasha Issenberg, a Philadelphia magazine writer (and occasional Washington Monthly
contributor) best known for exposing the mendacity of New York Times columnist
David Brooks, shares these macho heroes’ zeal for sushi. But he also realizes that
there’s something a smidge bizarre about a world in which the landlocked residents of,
say, Oklahoma or Paraguay enjoy seemingly inexhaustible supplies of fatty tuna, while
Tokyoites have learned to love unagi (grilled eel) served on buttery croissants. Issenberg’s
meticulously reported The Sushi Economy: Globalization and the Making of a Modern
Delicacy explains not only how sushi evolved from reviled curiosity into beloved
treat in the United States, but also how the skyrocketing demand for ika (squid), uni
(sea urchin roe), and, above all, toro has simultaneously knocked both nature and commerce
askew.
The Sushi Economy opens with a zinger of an anecdote, which Issenberg presents as
modern sushi’s Eureka moment. In the early 1970s, executives at Japan Airlines fretted
that the cargo holds on their Vancouver-to-Tokyo flights were often empty. So the
airline asked its Canadian freight coordinator, a man named Wayne MacAlpine, to look
into whether these planes could be crammed with bluefin tuna from Prince Edward Island.
McAlpine was somewhat baffled by the request, since fishermen on the island,
some 2,800 miles to the east of Vancouver, didn’t much care for the bluefin’s taste—as he Teletyped back to his bosses in Japan,
“What [the fishermen] did after
they caught them is they had their picture
taken with the fish and dug a hole
with a small bulldozer and buried them.”
The airline executives were stunned:
each buried bluefin could garner hundreds,
even thousands, of dollars in Japan,
a country already suffering the ravages
of overfishing. The company took the unprecedented
step of importing five Canadian
bluefins for a 1972 auction at Tokyo’s
Tsukiji fish market. The giant tunas
proved a hit, selling for the then-steep
price of $4 per kilogram. The race to satiate
the world’s toro jones was on. “Sushi
was nearly two millennia old,” writes
Issenberg, “but it was that morning at
Tsukiji that the current experience of
eating it was born.”
The Japan Airlines experiment was
largely a triumph of technology: a special
refrigeration unit had been developed to
prevent the tunas’ flesh from blanching
while in transit. Yet it also signaled how
Japan’s culinary tastes, as well as its economic
fortunes, had changed since the Imperial
Era. Before World War II, tuna was
considered an inferior fish, sushi’s answer
to beef knuckles. And the fattiest part of
a tuna wasn’t even deemed fit for human
consumption; it was instead reserved for
cat food. The Japanese first learned the
pleasures of greasy meats during the late
1940s, when they mimicked the carnivorous
habits of their American occupiers.
As their nation’s fiscal health improved,
Issenberg writes, the Japanese began to
indulge ever more openly in gastronomic
excess: “Soon, Tokyo palates were acting
a lot like those in Paris or Chicago, which
associated luxury with rich fat, whether
in fois gras, chocolate truffles, soft cheese,
or porterhouses-for-two.”
One of the first non-Japanese entrepreneurs
to capitalize on this trend was
a man known for presiding over mass
weddings rather than hooking fish: Reverend
Sun Myung Moon, founder of the
controversial Unification Church. In
1978, Moon opened a tuna business in
Gloucester, Massachusetts, transforming
the coastal town into a major toro supplier.
Another business founded by Moon,
True World Foods of Chicago, would go
on to become America’s dominant sushi
supplier; odds are your last piece of kanpachi
(young yellowtail) or saba (mackerel)
passed through True World’s hands.
When Japan’s economy was at its
frothiest, Gloucester bluefins could fetch
$50 per pound at Tsukiji. But overfishing
and the yen’s tumble have ended those
halcyon days, as Issenberg discovered on
his gloomy visit to New England: “Where
fishermen once might have wanted to
know whether anyone had a fish that
broke $20 per pound in Tokyo, now they
just wanted to know whether anything
had been caught at all.”
Australian aquaculturists have gladly
filled the void. In one of The Sushi Economy’s
best chapters, Issenberg heads
to Port Lincoln, home to Australia’s so-called
tuna barons, who raise the prized
fish in pens. Keeping the world awash in
sushi has made the barons exorbitantly
wealthy: I don’t think I’ll ever have another
piece of toro without thinking of
Sam Sarin, a baron who styled his garish
estate after Southfork Ranch, home
to the Ewing clan on the 1980s soap opera
Dallas. The Port Lincoln tunas aren’t
considered of especially high quality (Issenberg
compares them to New Balance
sneakers), but that doesn’t bother many
buyers nowadays—the end consumers
who pay $5.99 for six-piece supermarket
sushi trays aren’t going to complain. Besides,
a good proportion of that ranched
tuna ends up in such novelties as spicy
tuna rolls, an American creation which
uses mayonnaise and hot sauce to mask
the taste of subpar fish.
Issenberg is clearly a lifelong sushi connoisseur,
so there’s a hint of sadness to
his descriptions of the cuisine’s vulgarization—the takeout chains where pieces are
“either punched out and assembled by automated
machines known as ‘sushi robots’
or by minimally trained human beings”;
the Los Angeles restaurant where the chefs
double as tap dancers. And he notes that the venerable Nobu Matsuhisa, whose
eponymous New York City restaurant
popularized nouveau sushi among the
glitterati, has become more corporate
mascot than authentic chef: “These days,
Matsuhisa seems to pick up a knife only
for photo shoots.” Nobu branches, meanwhile,
now operate in Dallas, Las Vegas,
and the Bahamas; in the last of these locations,
every single piece of fish must be
shipped in from Miami, since there is no
local seafood market.
But Issenberg never wallows in foodie
nostalgia. Instead, he celebrates sushi’s
emergence as a case of globalization
at its best, with consumers and producers
working in relative harmony despite
rarely encountering one another face-to-face.
At its best, The Sushi Economy reads
like the giddiest, geekiest Food Network
special ever made, a paean to man’s endless
innovation in the name of gluttony. It’s certainly tough not to enjoy a book
that includes a step-by-step guide to
winning Port Lincoln’s annual tuna-tossing
competition (“Stand with your back
to the intended destination and spin two
rotations counterclockwise …”).
There are moments, however, when
Issenberg’s infatuation with microscopic
detail can grate rather than entertain.
A chapter on the education of a Texan
sushi chef, for example, bogs down in a
list of his restaurant’s expenditures, broken
down to the dollar.
And Issenberg’s description
of the Tsukiji
market moves at a
snail’s pace, as he fixates
on the compound’s geometric
layout: “There are
eight streets,” he writes,
“ordered concentrically,
which are intersected
by seven avenues, evenly
spaced radii …”
Thankfully, The Sushi
Economy never entirely
loses sight of its larger themes. Issenberg
views sushi’s spread as confirmation that
“a virtuous global commerce and food culture
can exist”—in other words, that people
can enjoy their toro without screwing
over another community some several
thousand miles away. He naturally credits
this to the free market and technological
progress, but also to genuine human decency.
Since fishing is such an uncertain
business, many of the deals that keep the
sushi trade afloat depend on trust, often
between two parties who don’t share the
same continent, let alone the same language.
Yet the system works, Issenberg
contends, because all societies share the
inborn knack for commerce—not to mention
the flexibility necessary to adapt foreign
cuisine for local palates.
These big-picture lessons about globalization
may not be particularly revelatory,
but they’re well illustrated by Issenberg’s
admirably exhaustive reporting.
Judging by the book’s acknowledgments,
he spent time in at least sixteen cities,
ranging from Shanghai to Barcelona to
Chascomus, Argentina. My only quibble
with Issenberg’s itinerary is that he never
spent time in—or, at least, he failed to
set a scene in—one of the countless mini-mall
sushi bars that now thrive in Landlocked
America, where toro was eschewed
as effete just a generation ago. (The Texas
restaurant doesn’t really count, as it’s located
in affluent, bohemian Austin.) But
perhaps this is understandable: if I were
in charge of organizing a sushi reporting
trip, I’d much rather dine at the Tsukiji
market in Tokyo than at Sushi Factory in
Omaha. |